Global Internet imprisoned in borders!

October 24, 1648 ended the most devastating conflict in European history. This confrontation began in 1618 when the Austrian Habsburgs (the German royal family, founded by the Count of Hapsburgs Albert in 1153), from 1440 to 1806, the Hapsburgs were the undisputed kings of the Holy Roman Empire. And also gave orders to Bohemia, etc.) tried to impose Roman Catholicism on Protestants in Bohemia. This movement set the Protestant Catholic and Holy Roman states against France, rulers of German princes and petty officials against each other and the king, and Hapsburgs against France. Thirty years later the most devastating war in European history came to an end in the West Felia area of ​​northwestern Germany, and the treaty was therefore called the "West Felia Treaty." These European states gained sovereignty after the treaty. The rights of states to control and defend their borders were laid on the foundation of political discipline around the world, and so far it has remained seamless, but China, Russia, and many other countries around the world have Internet access. But want to establish their sovereignty. In 2010, delegations from different countries, including Syria and Russia, filed a unique request to the United Nations, calling for the determination of sovereign borders in the digital world in this strange request. Haskell Sharp, an independent Internet policy consultant who was then director of technology policy at Cisco, a large technology company, has something to say about the request: 'The United States was demanding that countries submit this unique request. Be provided with a specific Internet address as country code for phone numbers has been provided to each country. 'After many years of negotiations on this request, nothing has happened because such borders Countries are allowed to impose strict sanctions on their citizens, which is against this fundamental freedom of the Internet. Under which the borders of the Internet is a place where no government is governed individually. The vacancies of the United Nations cannot remove the misconception of their nation about how you can build a wall on the edge of your cyberspace. They spent the last decade just finding ways to make that possible. Russia is already known for trying to create a digital border wall, and two bills were passed in the Russian parliament in February this year, ordering the Russian Internet to take technical and legal steps to separate the world from the Internet. Has been released. Following the approval of the bills, protests against Russia's Internet policies in the capital Moscow began. Russia is among the growing number of countries that are the backbone of most Western-made and Western-controlled Internet. However, for Russia to make the first attempt to make it possible will be very difficult to determine which information should enter the country and which information does not. Access to it is a fundamental deviation from past efforts. "This is a different thing," said Robert Morgas, senior cyber security analyst at the US think tank 'New America Foundation', on Russia's efforts to establish digital borders, with Russia's desire to break the internet globally. Probably could go further with North Korea and Iran's objections. This desire of Russia is a glimpse of the independence of the Internet in the future. Today, countries that are looking for digital 'West Felianism' are nothing more than dictatorial thinking, and they are doing it internally with greater depth. His project is also being supported by technological advances, which have led to growing global concerns that the open Internet was, at times, a good idea for its launch. The new approach has not only increased the possibility of creating a sovereign Internet for the countries of the world, but has paved the way for the formation of a parallel Internet based on its structure among countries with similar thinking. What's wrong with Open Internet? As we all know, many countries are unhappy with the Western alliance ruling the Internet. It is not just the Western-backed philosophy that creates problems for them, but the way in which these philosophies are used to defeat others in the structure of the Internet, rather than to do it politely. Make sure no one can get protection from sending anything to anyone. And thanks to the Internet's basic protocol for work on which a delegation from different countries submitted an application in 2012, TCP / IP (Transmission Control Protocol / Internet Protocol) The flow of information continues to be free from confinement to a region or geographical boundaries. It does not matter where the information is sent to, the country from which this information is coming from, or the laws of the country receiving the information, it operates on the Internet address only. This is why TCP / IP receives packets of information needed from point A to point B, rather than sending data on a predefined route that can be intercepted or diverted. Rejecting objections to this setup of the Internet Protocol is easy for dictatorial governments in the face of universal democratic forces, but these problems do not affect only authoritarian governments. Any government can be affected by harmful information. A clear example of this is the 'malware' (special software designed to illegally access computer systems and destroy important information) targeting military installations in the Middle East and North America this year. Declared to be the world's deadliest and killer malware, in addition to false and fabricated news, the election results are impressive, a prime example of which is the last US election. Open Internet is a key factor in President Donald Trump's victory Thousands of fake articles and fake news that have been posted in favor of Trump on fake news websites, Facebook, Twitter, blogs and forums have paved the way for Trump to become US president. These fake news and articles were liked and shared more than real news worldwide through social media. Sharing it with other people without verifying the news has paved the way for a person like Trump to become president. Thanks to the open internet, these fake news websites working on humor, propaganda or an agenda are paving the way for political leaders around the world. These fake websites, also known as "hoax news" websites, use social media extensively to bring readers to their websites. The main purpose of these websites is to facilitate propaganda or public opinion in favor of or against a particular political, religious party, rather than entertainment and accurate information in order to gain economic and other benefits. In most countries of the world, including Pakistan, the United States, Germany, the Philippines, Sweden, Myanmar, false news is spread and disseminated in favor of and against the political parties, and TCP / IP is free from any restrictions or restrictions. The flow of information continues. Russia and China are more open to the information flowing on the Internet than others And their potential to quickly understand the potential impact of the decision. They also understood the impact it had on the political level. Their view was that the citizens of the country have the same importance as a high-value power plant, and they need to be protected from harmful information, such as land assets, with harmful viruses and false news. Is. In this regard, Lincoln Pegman, a Russian scholar at Oxford University and a Research Fellow at London's Think Tank Foreign Policy Center, says: "The Russian government's goal of incarcerating the Internet in digital borders is to gain more control over public safety. ' Russia and China have begun negotiations with the establishment of the Burmese sovereign Internet since 2011 and 2012. In late 2015, Chinese President Xi Jung Ping called on all countries of the world to respect the cyber sovereignty of other countries and establish a separate Internet governance model. At the World Internet Conference in the capital Beijing, the Chinese president said that every country should be given the right to It should be noted that China has strict laws on Internet usage. The number of users using the Internet in China has exceeded 650 million, but they do not have access to Google, Facebook and many other websites. Russian President Putin is also working to establish digital borders to protect its citizens from the open Internet chaos. But considering the ground truth, establishing an independent Internet and separating yourself from the Global Internet is not so easy. A single cable connects a country to the global Internet. You can disconnect this connection by just dropping a switch, some countries are considering implementing similar infrastructure, but looking at it only in the context of hardware, it seems almost impossible. Paul Berford, a computer scientist at the University of Wisconsin, says that "in countries where there is rich and diverse Internet connectivity, it would be impossible to actually identify the internal and external points, even if Russia needed all the information flow. Even if he gets the hardware, he will not be able to provide this kind of internet service to his citizens, apart from being happy with his separation from the global economy. Now the Internet is a real and important part of the worldwide trade, and Russia cannot disassociate itself from this system without damaging its economy. How can the flow of information be sustained in the path of others, or how can a TCP / IP act like the autonomy of the Internet while blaming materialism? ' Adam Siegel, a cyber security expert at the American Think Tank Council on Foreign Relations, says that "orders in China are causing problems for authorized internet." It blocks certain Internet addresses, specific words, specific IP addresses. You can't call it a lot of expertise, it can all be eliminated with one software, and there are many software around the world, such as Tor, to eliminate virtual private networks and censorship. Secondly, China's autonomous Internet system will not work for Russia, it will rely on major Chinese platforms to download content, limiting the global Internet to enter its borders. The scale will allow for internal and external points, while for Russia, which initially welcomes the proliferation of the Internet, it will create problems for bilateral relations. Russia cannot afford to distance itself from the corporate internet, nor can it adopt the Chinese concept of the Internet. Therefore, Russia will have to work on a hybrid system that does not rely solely on hardware or software. It will have to create its own Internet Protocol to drive traffic to its designated destinations. The Internet Protocol is a mixture of various complex things such as algorithms, IP addresses, different layers, etc. And the main thing is DNS standards, it's an address book that tells the Internet how to translate IP addresses, for example an IP address is 38.160.150.31, like DNS bbc for humans to understand. Translates to .co.uk, and doing all this will not be so easy for Russia and China. According to cyber security experts, Russia, China, and the supporters of a sovereign Internet base aim to control their citizens more than the sovereign Internet. لہ Digital decision makers are increasing the number of countries around the world who are taking great interest in the idea of ​​establishing a dictatorship on the Internet. In a research journal published last year in the article titled 'The Digital Desider', it was clearly stated that 'digital decision makers' are states, including Israel, Singapore, Brazil, Ukraine and India. Other countries, too, are trending to gain more and more autonomy in the pursuit of information. The reasons for everyone's growing trend are different, but many of those countries have the same conditions: Ukraine, Israel and South Korea, which have always been in a state of conflict, use the Internet to subdue their enemies. Using weapons as. According to experts in the Internet industry, the strategic use of the Internet, especially social media, has turned into a battleground. Even with its open reputation and universal credibility, South Korea has developed an excellent tactic for crackdown against illegal information available online. South Korea has recently blocked a large number of websites that promote counterfeiting, theft, gambling and pornography. The Internet Access Policy was announced in February this year by the Korean Communications Commission (KCC), whose sole purpose is to fully monitor the Internet, the Korean Communications Standard Commission (KCSC), a Korean government agency. And enforcing the law to prevent censorship, access to specific websites that display glamor and pornographic content. This tactic of South Korea may also lean toward policy makers in countries such as Russia and China, which are in line with China's 'Great Firewall' or Russia's new Internet policy. This South Korean law is very similar to the US proposed law, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protection IP Act (PIPA). The law became headlines in January 2012 when a large number of Internet companies protested against the proposed law and 'blacked out' on their websites. Initially, the law allowed the US Department of Justice to ban access to websites providing Internet service to U.S. companies providing Internet services, although this bill could not be approved but offline ( Through democratic procedures) the law was applied to the line. South Korea is also trying to create a national content firewall through pre-existing laws. However, it also protects its citizens from the harmful information available on the Internet in order to see its widespread impact. There is a need to maintain a balanced responsibility. Now the question arises whether Korea and other digital decision makers like it can copy Chinese or Russian models China's technique means, for a small country, a unique style of autonomy, the Russian model has not yet been fully tested. The minimum cost of copying these two models is also tens of millions of dollars. India and Brazil, the two major digital decision makers, have long sought the global Internet through a method that does not rely on the 'open values' of the West and against national interests. Their internet and political values ​​are in the middle of them for the past decade. Both countries have also tried to find alternatives to the two opposing versions of the Internet that appear today. The change was prompted when Russia's propaganda website RT published the news that Brazil and India would work with Russia, China and South Africa to create an alternative 'BRICS Internet'. In those days, however, Russia also claimed the creation of an 'infrastructure protection'. However, the project could not go further because Russia and the Cheyendon were gaining a lot of interest in the BRICS. Some international powers are also looking at China's "Belt Road" project, under China 'Twenty-first Century Highway Silk' project, connecting Tajikistan, Djibouti and Zimbabwe to land routes, shipping lanes to connect Asia to Europe. According to an estimate by London's International Institute for Strategic Studies, China is currently engaged in nearly the same communications project in the world, under which it is able to build cable and network in other countries. Setting up work. There is also a possibility in this scenario that other countries will join with Russia and China to develop the same infrastructure, so that they do business from the rest of the world, essentially stabilizing each other by positioning themselves on the Western Internet. The smaller countries will probably prefer the Internet beyond a Western standard, which gives them the opportunity to participate in the semi-global economy, as well as control their population in the context of 'Internet experiences'. ۔ Maria Farrell of Open Rights Group, a campaign for freedom of expression on the Internet, says that China's One Belt, One Road project is offering plug-and-play internet to decision-making countries, and for the first time in the West This is the first choice to go online without relying on Internet infrastructure. This would be a great choice for countries such as Zimbabwe, Djibouti and Uganda who do not want the Internet to be accessed only by Google and Facebook. Russia is working on re-inventing DNS and the authoritative plug-and-play Internet of Belt Road project is giving these countries access to signups in China's own Internet protocol. And the day is not far when the Western monopoly on the internet is gone.